ГЕНДЕРНА АСИМЕТРІЯ У СУЧАСНОМУ МІЖНАРОДНОМУ МЕНЕДЖМЕНТІ
Н. В. Безрукова, В. А. Свічкарь
DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2020.10.56
УДК: 339.139
Н. В. Безрукова, В. А. Свічкарь
ГЕНДЕРНА АСИМЕТРІЯ У СУЧАСНОМУ МІЖНАРОДНОМУ МЕНЕДЖМЕНТІ
Анотація
Глобалізація є провідною тенденцією розвитку сучасної економіки. Глобалізаційні процеси формують нові вимоги до розробки управлінських підходів з метою забезпечення найвищої результативності діяльності компаній. Мета даного дослідження полягає в аналізі гендерної асиметрії у сучасному міжнародному менеджменті. В статті авторами проаналізовано ряд досліджень, які доводять зростаючу роль жінок у вищому керівництві компаній. Проведено порівняння стилів менеджменту керівників-жінок та керівників-чоловіків. Відзначено, що особисті характеристики жінок забезпечують їм переваги у реалізації управлінської діяльності в певних економічних сферах. В роботі також досліджено специфіку гендерних проблем України. Автори дійшли висновку, що в умовах постіндустріальної економіки з’являються нові фактори сучасного розвитку, неврахування яких значно скорочує ефективність функціонування компаній та держави в цілому. Одним з них є гендерна асиметрія. Розширення можливостей жінок та скорочення гендерного розриву сприяє зниженню бідності, зростанню темпів економічного розвитку та збільшенню продуктивності праці.
Ключові слова: гендерна асиметрія; міжнародний менеджмент; економічний розвиток; управлінське рішення; управлінська ефективність.
Література
1. ІНДЕКС ГЕНДЕРНОЇ РІЗНОМАНІТНОСТІ, 2011–2017, 2020 Жінки в керівництві, URL: https://www.2020wob.com/sites/default/files/2020GDI-2017Report.pdf (дата звернення 11.08.2020).
2. Adams B.R., Ferreira D. Women in the Boardroom and their Impact on Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, Vol. 94(2), 291–309, URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2016-0208 (дата звернення 16.08.2020).
3. Adams B.R., Funk P.. Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter? Management Science, 2012, Vol. 58(2), 219–235, URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452 (дата звернення 15.08.2020).
4. Adams R.B., Gray S., Nowland J. Does Gender Matter in the Boardroom? Evidence from the Market Reaction to Mandatory New Director Announcements. Working Paper, 2 November 2011, URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1953152 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1953152 (дата звернення 15.08.2020).
5. Afolabi A.O. Stereotypes against women: how do subordinates perceive the job performance and level of achievement of their leaders? Gender and Behaviour, 2013, Vol. 11 (2), 5698–5706, URL: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3147365101/stereotypes-against-women-how-do-subordinates-perceive (дата звернення 13.08.2020).
6. Ayman R., Korabik K. Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 2010, 65(3), 157-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018806.
7. 2015 CWDI Report: Women Directors of Fortune Global 200: 2004-2014, URL: http://globewomen.org/CWDInet/index.php/2015-cwdi-fortune-global-200-report/ (дата звернення 10.08.2020).
8. Державна служба зайнятості України, Офіційний сайт, URL: https://www.dcz.gov.ua (дата звернення 15.08.2020).
9. Eagly A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt M. C., Van Engen M. L. Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men. Psychological bulletin, 2003, Vol. 129(4), 569-591, URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569 (дата звернення 10.08.2020).
10. ЄВРОСТАТ, Офіційний сайт, URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ (дата звернення 16.08.2020).
11. Foldy E.G. Something of collaborative manufacture: the construction of race and gender identities in organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2012, Vol. 48(4), 495–524, URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886312440041 (дата звернення 09.08.2020).
12. Goleman D. The Brain and Emotional Intelligence: New Insights. Northampton, MA: More Than Sound LLC, 2012, 72 pages.
13. Grant A., Taylor A. Communication Essentials for Female Executives to Develop Leadership Presence: Getting Beyond the Barriers of Understating Accomplishment. Business Horizons, 2014, Vol. 57(1), 73–83, URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.09.003. (дата звернення 10.08.2020).
14. Hausmann R., Tyson L.D., & Zahidi S. The Global Gender Gap Report. World Economic Forum, 2009, URL: https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/ files/growthlab/files/wef_gendergap_report_2009.pdf. (дата звернення 12.08.2020).
15. Women in Business and Management: Gaining Momentum. Global Report. International Labour Organization, 2015, URL: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/ groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_ 316450.pdf (дата звернення 12.08.2020).
16. Koenig A.M., Mitchell A.A., Eagly A.H., Ristikari T. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, Vol. 137(4), 616–642, URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557 (дата звернення 12.08.2020).
17. Korabik K., Lero D., Ayman R.. A multi-level approach to cross-cultural work-family research: A micro-and macro-perspective. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 2003, Vol.3, 289-303, URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595803003003003 (дата звернення 07.08.2020).
18. Leow Kah Loong. The Organizational Commitment: The Study of Mentoring and Leader-member Exchange (Lmx) Among Auditors in Malaysia-moderating Effects of Gender. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences: Annual Review, 2011, Vol.6(1), 123-146, URL: https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v06i01/51993 (дата звернення 08.08.2020).
19. Levi M., Li K., Zhang F. Director Gender and Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2013, Vol. 28, 185-200, URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jcorpfin.2013.11.005 (дата звернення 16.08.2020).
20. Люсин Д. Сучасні уявлення про емоційний інтелект. Соціальний інтелект: теорія, вимірювання, дослідження. Москва, Російська академія наук, 2004, С.29-36.
21. Lupano P.M.L., Castro S.A. Intergroup anxiety, cultural sensitivity and socio-cultural diverse leaders effectiveness. The International Journal of Psychological Research, 2015, 8(1), 36–45, URL: https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.643. (дата звернення 11.08.2020).
22. Liu Y., Wei Z., Xie F. Do Women Directors Improve Firm Performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, 2013, Vol. 28(C), 169-184, URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016. (дата звернення 13.08.2020).
23. Цілі сталого розвитку: Україна. Національний звіт, Київ, Міністерство економічного розвитку і торгівлі, 2017, URL: http://un.org.ua/images/SDGs_NationalReportUA_Web_1.pdf (дата звернення 15.08.2020).
24. Smith L. and others. The Importance of Women’s Status for Child Nutrition in Development Countries. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, 2009, 187 р, URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/ bitstream/16526/1/rr030131.pdf (дата звернення 12.08.2020).
25. Thoroughgood C.N., Sawyer K.B., Hunter, S.T. Real Men Don't Make Mistakes: Investigating the Effects of Leader Gender, Error Type, and the Occupational Context on Leader Error Perceptions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2013. Vol. 28, 31–48, URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9263-8 (дата звернення 14.08.2020).
26. Tzannatos Z. Women and Labor Market Changes in the Global Economy: Growth Helps, Inequalities Hurt and Public Policy Matters. World Development, 1999, Vol. 27 (3), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00156-9.
27. Measuring Knowledge in the World’s Economies. KEI and KI Indexes, World Bank, 2008, URL: http://web.worldbank.org/archive/ website01030/WEB /IMAGES/KAM_V4.PDF (дата звернення 11.08.2020).
28. The Global Competitiveness Repot 2010-2011, World Economic Forum, 2012, URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF _GlobalCompetitiveness Report_2010-11.pdf (дата звернення 14.08.2020).
29. Організація Об`єднаних Націй, Офіційний сайт, URL: http://www.un.org. (дата звернення 14.08.2020).
30. Державна служба статистики України, Офіційний сайт, URL: http://ukrstat.gov.ua (дата звернення 14.08.2020).
31. Єдиний державний реєстр підприємств України, Офіційний сайт, URL: https://usr.minjust.gov.ua/ua/freesearch (дата звернення 13.08.2020).
N. Bezrukova, V. Svichkar
GENDER ASYMMETRY IN THE MODERN INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT
Summary
The globalization processes taking place in modern economy shape new requirements for the development of managerial approaches aimed at ensuring the highest performance of companies. Gender diversity of top management can provide a comprehensive view of the top management of the company's development, improve its reputation and increase investor interest in the company. At present, management processes take place at two parallel levels: a traditional in-house level, which involves direct managers and subordinates, and a virtual one, since much of the work is done by employees outside the office space and without the participation of their direct managers. Thus, firms outsource some of their functions, only concentrating their efforts on the core activities that are priority for them. Theoretical studies increasingly place more emphasis on non-financial aspects of the company’s operations that influence managerial decision making such as gender asymmetry in modern corporations. The purpose of this study is to analyze the gender asymmetry in the modern international management. The paper analyzes a series of studies that prove the growing role of women in the top management of companies. The authors compare management styles of female and male managers. Gender structure of the company top management affects the efficiency of its activities, corporate culture, and the relationship with potential investors. Women are increasingly reaching key positions in top management and on boards of directors of the leading companies of the world. Among the objective factors that explain the increase in the presence of women on the companies’ boards of directors one should first of all highlight legislative quotas, global demographic and social trends. In Fortune's top companies, the number of women on the boards of directors is steadily increasing. The sectors with the highest gender diversity were Consumer Cyclical, Industrials and Real Estate sectors. The specifics of gender issues in Ukraine are researched. The study has shown that employed women are more likely to be hired and, accordingly, they are more rarely employers and self-employed persons. Branches and activities that are mainly headed by women and those that are predominantly headed by men are highlighted.
The authors came to the conclusion that under the conditions of the post-industrial economy there arise new factors of modern development, and the failure to consider them significantly reduces the efficiency of the functioning of companies and the state as a whole.
Keywords: gender asymmetry; international management; economic development; management solution; management efficiency.
References
1. 2020 WOMEN ON BOARDS (2017). GENDER DIVERSITY INDEX, 2011–2017, available at: https://www.2020wob.com/sites/default/files/2020GDI-2017Report.pdf (Accessed 11 Aug 2020).
2. Adams, B.R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the Boardroom and their Impact on Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 94(2), 291–309, available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2016-0208 (Accessed 16 Aug 2020).
3. Adams, B.R., & Funk P. (2012). Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter? Management Science, Vol. 58(2), 219–235, available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452 (Accessed 15 Aug 2020).
4. Adams, R.B., Gray, S. & Nowland, J. (November 2, 2011). Does Gender Matter in the Boardroom? Evidence from the Market Reaction to Mandatory New Director Announcements. Working Paper, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1953152 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1953152 (Accessed 15 Aug 2020).
5. Afolabi, A.O. (2013). Stereotypes against women: how do subordinates perceive the job performance and level of achievement of their leaders? Gender and Behaviour, Vol. 11 (2), 5698–5706, available at: https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-3147365101/stereotypes-against-women-how-do-subordinates-perceive (Accessed 13 Aug 2020).
6. Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010). Leadership: Why gender and culture matter. American Psychologist, 65(3), 157-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018806.
7. CWDI (2015). Report on Women Directors of Fortune Global 200: 2004-2014, available at: http://globewomen.org/ CWDInet/index.php/2015-cwdi-fortune-global-200-report/ (Accessed 10 Aug 2020).
8. DSZU (2018). State Employment Service of Ukraine. Official site, available at: https://www.dcz.gov.ua (Accessed 15 Aug 2020).
9. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 129(4), 569-591, available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569 (Accessed 10 Aug 2020).
10. Eurostat (2020). State Statistics Service of EU. Official site, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ (Accessed 16 Aug 2020).
11. Foldy, E.G. (2012). Something of collaborative manufacture: the construction of race and gender identities in organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 48(4), 495–524, available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886312440041 (Accessed 09 Aug 2020).
12. Goleman, D. (2011). The Brain and Emotional Intelligence: New Insights. Northampton, MA: More Than Sound LLC, 72 pages.
13. Grant, A., & Taylor, A. (2014). Communication Essentials for Female Executives to Develop Leadership Presence: Getting Beyond the Barriers of Understating Accomplishment. Business Horizons, Vol. 57(1), 73–83, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.09.003. (Accessed 10 Aug 2020).
14. Hausmann, R., Tyson, L.D., & Zahidi, S. (2009). The Global Gender Gap Report. World Economic Forum, available at: https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/files/growthlab/files/wef_gendergap_report_2009.pdf. (Accessed 12 Aug 2020).
15 International Labor Organization (2015). Women in Business and Management: Gaining Momentum. Global Report. International Labour Organization, 2015, available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_316450.pdf (Accessed 12 Aug 2020).
16. Koenig A.M., Mitchell A.A., Eagly A.H., & Ristikari T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 137(4), 616–642, available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557 (Accessed 12 Aug 2020).
17. Korabik, K., Lero, D., & Ayman, R. (2003). A multi-level approach to cross-cultural work-family research: A micro-and macro-perspective. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, Vol.3, 289-303, available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595803003003003 (Accessed 07 Aug 2020).
18. Leow, Kah Loong (2011). The Organizational Commitment: The Study of Mentoring and Leader-member Exchange (Lmx) Among Auditors in Malaysia-moderating Effects of Gender. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences: Annual Review, Vol.6(1), 123-146, available at: https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v06i01/51993 (Accessed 08 Aug 2020).
19. Levi, M., Li, K., & Zhang, F. (2013). Director Gender and Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 28, 185-200, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jcorpfin.2013.11.005 (Accessed 16 Aug 2020).
20. Lioussine, D. (2004). Contemporary ideas about emotional intelligence. Social Intellect: Theory, Measurement, Research. Moscow, the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29-36.
21. Lupano, P.M.L., & Castro, S.A. (2015). Intergroup anxiety, cultural sensitivity and socio-cultural diverse leaders effectiveness. The International Journal of Psychological Research, 8(1), 36–45, available at: https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.643. (Accessed 11 Aug 2020).
22. Liu, Y., Wei, Z., & Xie, F. (2013). Do Women Directors Improve Firm Performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 28(C), 169-184, available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016. (Accessed 13 Aug 2020).
23. MEDITU (2017). Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine. National Report, Kyiv, Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, 2017, available at: http://un.org.ua/images/SDGs_NationalReportUA_Web_1.pdf (Accessed 15 Aug 2020).
24. Smith L. and others (2009). The Importance of Women’s Status for Child Nutrition in Development Countries. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC: 187 р, available at: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/ bitstream/16526/1/rr030131.pdf (Accessed 12 Aug 2020).
25. Thoroughgood, C.N., Sawyer, K.B., & Hunter, S.T. (2013). Real Men Don't Make Mistakes: Investigating the Effects of Leader Gender, Error Type, and the Occupational Context on Leader Error Perceptions. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 28, 31–48, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9263-8 (Accessed 14 Aug 2020).
26. Tzannatos, Z. (1999). Women and Labor Market Changes in the Global Economy: Growth Helps, Inequalities Hurt and Public Policy Matters. World Development, Vol. 27 (3), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00156-9.
27. World Bank (2008). Measuring Knowledge in the World’s Economies. KEI and KI Indexes, available at: http://web.worldbank.org/archive/ website01030/WEB /IMAGES/KAM_V4.PDF. (Accessed 11 Aug 2020).
28. World Economic Forum (2012). The Global Competitiveness Repot 2010-2011, available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF _GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf (Accessed 14 Aug 2020).
29. UN (2020). UNITED NATIONS, Official site, available at: http://www.un.org. (Accessed 14 Aug 2020).
30. UKRSTAT (2020). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Official site, available at: http://ukrstat.gov.ua (Accessed 14 Aug 2020).
31. USR (2020). The Unified State Register of Legal Entities, Individuals-Entrepreneurs and Public Units, available at: https://usr.minjust.gov.ua/ua/freesearch (Accessed 13 Aug 2020).
№ 10 2020
Дата публікації: 2020-11-27
Кількість переглядів: 8817